- No upcoming events available
Working on the Railroad
Story summary:
For two weeks in May, Erik Camayd-Freixas, a Spanish interpreter with 23 years of experience and federal court certification, worked nearly round the clock as a translator for almost 400 illegal immigrants snatched in a raid on an Iowa meatpacking plant. His firsthand account describes in shocking detail how prosecutors trampled the immigrants' right to due process and made a mockery of justice. The immigrants, wrote Camayd-Freixas, a professor of Spanish at Florida International University, were charged with serious criminal offenses instead of civil immigration offenses. The harsh, mandatory sentences for the offenses railroaded the immigrants, many Guatemalan peasants illiterate in English and Spanish, into pleading guilty to crimes they could not have been guilty of.
Working on the Railroad
For two weeks in May, Erik Camayd-Freixas, a Spanish interpreter with 23 years of experience and federal court certification, worked nearly round the clock as a translator for almost 400 illegal immigrants snatched in a raid on an Iowa meatpacking plant. His firsthand account describes in shocking detail how prosecutors trampled the immigrants' right to due process and made a mockery of justice.
The immigrants, wrote Camayd-Freixas, a professor of Spanish at Florida International University, were charged with serious criminal offenses instead of civil immigration offenses. The harsh, mandatory sentences for the offenses railroaded the immigrants, many Guatemalan peasants illiterate in English and Spanish, into pleading guilty to crimes they could not have been guilty of.
Many of the illegal workers, the translator said, simply did not understand the charges against them or the rights they had waived. Making matters worse, the speed of the proceedings, volume of cases and circumstances of the makeshift court facilities prevented defense attorneys from engaging in private discussion with their clients.
No matter how fed up some Americans have become with the number of undocumented foreigners who illegally cross U.S. borders in search of work, such blatant trampling of everyone's right to due process is unacceptable. When the government can disregard the Constitution, it is as much a danger to American citizens as it is to powerless Latin American peasants caught up in a federal immigration dragnet.
Americans have faced similar situations. Texans need only consider how hundreds of children belonging to the Fundamentalist Church of Latter Day Saints were removed from their homes and placed in state custody. Their parents were afforded only chaotic and perfunctory hearings in a massive group setting — proceedings that were widely criticized for their failure to consider each person's case separately and observe due process.
In the Iowa case, 390 immigrants were arrested by federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents at the Agriprocessors kosher slaughterhouse in Postville, Iowa. Instead of deporting the illegal workers as usual, the government charged 306 with aggravated identity theft and Social Security fraud.
As one of 26 interpreters, Camayd-Freixas had a front-row seat to the farce. Each of the 18 defense attorneys brought in represented around 17 clients, who made their initial court appearances in assemby-line fashion: groups of 10 at a time, chained together and shackled at the wrists, waist and legs. The attorneys were rushed by prosecutors working to beat a 72-hour habeas corpus deadline after which criminal charges would be dropped and detainees immediately deported. The handful of immigrants that missed the deadline and were deported home turned out to be the fortunate few.
