Disclaimer Proposed for Anti-Abortion Clinics

Story summary:

A regulation proposed by Montgomery County officials Tuesday would require pregnancy centers run by abortion opponents to give women a disclaimer so they don't mistake the centers for medical clinics and so they understand the source of the information given to them. The centers can appear to be abortion clinics and often bill themselves as places to get information on the procedure, but they seek to dissuade women from ending their pregnancies. The camps in the abortion debate see those clinics, and the conversations there, often with women at moments of personal distress, through the prism of their advocacy and experience. Abortion rights supporters cast them as manipulative, dishonest and dangerous, and abortion opponents see them as lifesaving, last-ditch refuges that help those who decide against termination.

Disclaimer Proposed for Anti-Abortion Clinics

Information from centers is misleading, inaccurate, Montgomery officials say

The Washington Post
11-11-09

A regulation proposed by Montgomery County officials Tuesday would require pregnancy centers run by abortion opponents to give women a disclaimer so they don't mistake the centers for medical clinics and so they understand the source of the information given to them.

The centers can appear to be abortion clinics and often bill themselves as places to get information on the procedure, but they seek to dissuade women from ending their pregnancies.

The camps in the abortion debate see those clinics, and the conversations there, often with women at moments of personal distress, through the prism of their advocacy and experience. Abortion rights supporters cast them as manipulative, dishonest and dangerous, and abortion opponents see them as lifesaving, last-ditch refuges that help those who decide against termination.

At issue in Montgomery, as in Baltimore, New York, West Virginia and other places such proposals have been taken up, is whether government officials should reach into the centers' activities by requiring them to provide certain information to those who walk in or call for advice. Montgomery officials who back the regulation -- it has seven co-sponsors on the nine-member County Council -- say it is a matter of consumer protection. A hearing on the measure is scheduled for Dec. 1.

"There is misleading and medically inaccurate information that's being provided to young women at these centers," said Duchy Trachtenberg (D-At Large), who introduced the proposal. Accurate information is in the public's interest, she said. "It's just a disclosure regulation. It's not telling them they can't look for clients. It's not telling them they can't counsel clients."

But Jacqueline Stippich, executive director of the Shady Grove Pregnancy Center, which officials said is one of three centers that could be affected by the proposal, questioned the constitutionality of the regulations. "My question is, why are they singling us out?" she said. "Do you think it's constitutional for the government to single out one type of organization over another and to regulate what they are going to say?"

There is evidence that some information is inaccurate. The Shady Grove Pregnancy Center's Web site, for example, says abortion can lead to an "increased potential for breast cancer." But, according to the National Cancer Institute, "having an abortion or miscarriage does not increase a woman's subsequent risk of developing breast cancer."

Stippich said the information about breast cancer is part of a list of things she tells women. "Would that be the one I would focus on? No. I would give you the whole list . . . just like you went to a doctor and you were having a procedure they would go through the list of possibilities," she said.


Join our Movement


Join Catholics in Alliance on Facebook!
Join Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good on Twitter

 

Catholics in Alliance is expanding our online presence. Connect with us on facebook or twitter.

Just Words: Our Blog